Cow Beh Cow Bu

Statistics Condemn Homosexual Relationships?

CONCERNEDSGCITIZEN – The whole PinkDot movement, done carnival-style to attract, with performances, music and speeches; self-reported attendance; on the surface promotes diversity, inclusivity and the freedom to love, but deep underneath, is really garnering support to change our social mores by altering our law and policies.


And the organisations and individuals pushing for it are likely believers of the sexual rights movement. It is a movement that began with America’s sexual revolution in their 1960s, based on the fraud science of Alfred Kinsey.


Proponents of the sexual rights movement prize sex as a right, and believe all forms of moral restraints on sex are ridiculous. They stand on the opposite end from those who prize morals as a critical pillar for societal well-being.


Proponents of the sexual rights movement do not accept the proven historic fact that public morality affects society gravely. They also do not agree with the principle that since a society is made up of people who appointed a government to maintain order and harmony, law therefore exists primarily for public good.


Statistics Show…


Now, to distinguish my speech from rhetoric, I shall provide some facts, meaningful analysis and evidences that informed groups of Singaporeans have raised as concerns regarding the agenda to promote “freedom to love”.


For example, an often heard but under analysed point of paramount concern, is the fact that the rates of STD and HIV infection among the gay community remains unimaginably sky high.


The heterosexual population makes up about 95% – 98% of the population, while the homosexual population only makes up 2% to 5%. Even then, HIV infection by homosexual sex overtakes that by heterosexual sex.


It must be noted that these are not statistics that happen out of the blue.


In 2006, HIV infection through heterosexual sex was 222, more than double that by homosexual sex, which was only 109. By 2011, infection by homosexual sex has overtaken that by heterosexual sex.


This trend where HIV infection among an extremely small community overtakes the rest of the population has persisted since then.


Last reported, in 2013, HIV infection rates by heterosexual sex have dropped to 181, while that by homosexual sex has risen to 247 – HIV infection among this subculture is now 35% more than the rest of the population!


If the statistics have not already shocked you, I invite you to take an analysis of this picture, so you may imagine the details.


Not a Pretty Picture


How much love today do we see among heterosexual communities? How many couples do we know really lead exemplary lifelong loving relationships?


Most people I have talked to would say that there are few. Most people are aware that among heterosexual communities, there is a great amount of cheating, betrayal, promiscuous behaviours.


If this is the love portrayed by the heterosexual community, what would you expect to be the “love” in the gay subculture – considering their rate of HIV infection is more than 20 times that of the heterosexual community?


Freedom to love is never really about the freedom to pursue monogamous lifelong relationships as what their rhetoric and propaganda portrays. It has always been to legalize sodomy so that all that is desired sexually by this subculture can be expressed in unrestrained manners, legally and freely.


But it will not stop here.


Once sodomy is legalized, expect genderless marriage to be pushed. Some activist claim that they are only fighting against the criminalizing of sodomy. Don’t be fooled by this insincere rhetoric.


Fact is, not one activist will be able to promise that genderless marriage will not be pushed if 377A is repealed.


Why is this so? Because it is not in anyone’s prerogative to decide what other activists would do.


Even if one activist decides not to push for genderless marriage, he can’t say that for all activists.


In this light, it is hence important to distinguish by law, the difference between heterosexual sex and homosexual sex.


Don’t Cry Foul


Homosexuality cannot lay claim to the biological origin and biological purpose that heterosexuality can, though it is not for this purpose alone that the act of homosexuality needs to be discriminated against.


While all minorities, including the LGBTs, are as entitled as anyone else to basic human rights, it is quite a different thing altogether to promote any group’s private beliefs or preferences – culminated into practices and cultural behaviour, into mainstream society.


Every form of practice and behaviour promoted into mainstream affects the society; hence, in all fairness, must be subjected to objective analysis and scrutiny.


Freedom to love? What if the Geylang community comes out and demands for it? No limits! Legalize every sex. Reduce the age of consent of sex with minors (and this is exactly what will be pushed for if 377A is removed)! What if they hold carnivals in colours and get celebrities to endorse their events. What if they meet with government officials and push for our laws to be removed. How would society react? Accept their proposal? Embrace their ideology?


Not as if society wants to stop them from having their fun privately, but they choose to, very publicly, impose upon society to embrace their “freedom to love”; unrelentingly push for changes to long established social norms and mores; seek to redefine marriage and family that will bring harm to children and religious liberty.


They cry foul and demand for public acceptance, while refusing to accept public accountability for the implications of their actions e.g. health concerns. Normal citizens like you and I are made to pay, while they unceasingly lobby and push their agenda.


For this reason, I believe wearwhite has to exist. Largely also because conservative Singaporeans have no confidence that our ministers and MPs still do care for the moral fabric of our nation.


This article is courtesy of CONCERNEDSGCITIZEN. It has been edited for brevity. The full article can be found here.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

To Top